Please nobody take this the wrong way but how does toddlercon turn anybody on? All the pictures ive seen are quite sickening and there only a few years old, i think we all have a limit on how far we can go... But toddlercon?
Fetishes: buy me a drink first then we'll talk about it
Reputation: 2624
Rep Power: 96
Re: Toddlercon = Big turn off?
the same question can be asked about guro, or even loli and shota. i think it's just a matter of preference.
some of it is kinda cute if you ask me, not a big fan of the hardcore stuff though.
__________________
when the mankind moves
rest of the life shakes
all once green turned into stone
flesh into dust and soil
where the last wave broke
the shores blazed red
a place once called home
turned into hall of dead
Please nobody take this the wrong way but how does toddlercon turn anybody on? All the pictures ive seen are quite sickening and there only a few years old, i think we all have a limit on how far we can go... But toddlercon?
It just doesnt make any sense to me folks.
Well, in your age, I would be pleasantly surprised if there could be anything at all that could possibly turn you on. No offense ma'am.... XD
I agree with Chaos. It is a matter of preference. For me it is so impossible that can't be taken seriously. It is more of a joke than stimulation. But some people like the idea, expressed in this kind of art, of having sex with a toddler. It is so cute and funny when the kid is drawn as enjoying sex.
I agree with chaos! Its all about what you like and what you dont, prefrence. I think some toddlercon is kinda cute. I like to see them in cute little poses but not getting screwed cuz for me that is way to much. Yet other people do like it.
Just putting it out there: aint my pic at the bottom just adorable ^_^
Fetishes: buy me a drink first then we'll talk about it
Reputation: 2624
Rep Power: 96
Re: Toddlercon = Big turn off?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolicongirl
Can she give consent?
isn't the whole point of toddlercon the same as lolicon or shotacon? the fantasy of it all? if that's the case then you could just, fantisize up some consent, right?
__________________
when the mankind moves
rest of the life shakes
all once green turned into stone
flesh into dust and soil
where the last wave broke
the shores blazed red
a place once called home
turned into hall of dead
isn't the whole point of toddlercon the same as lolicon or shotacon? the fantasy of it all? if that's the case then you could just, fantisize up some consent, right?
If my fantasy ever turns into that direction, I'll take a headshot with a big smile! Those toddlers may be cute but never sexy! There's no way I can see them in another way than as a little sister or maybe daughter.
Like I said before, I keep my fantasy close to real and wouldn't fantasize over something I'd not like to see in reality. If I don't want to see real rape, I also don't want to have rape fantasies!
That's why I don't like toddlercon.
I'm simply not attracted to girls younger than 12! Thats the line I cut for thinking a girl is cute and maybe start to get to know each other, but no physical contact at all. Next stage is 14 where the line is cut by holding hands or even a little kiss if she wants to. 16 for me is the minimum for thinking of a girl in a full sexual way, but these days most girls who hit that age are much more expierienced than many of us and that's also a big turnoff for me! The best girl IMO would be a 16-18yo virgin, but I think something like that doesn't exist anymore!:frown:
I can't relate to it either, Lolicon Girl. Besides their drastically underdeveloped, androgynous form / pudgy the fact of the matter is, toddlers don't fuck back nor do they physiologically express that they would or be able to handle it safely. Older kids significantly more frequently have sexual libidos, while toddlers almost if not always possess none, which, implies that toddlercon has a de facto rapist appeal and a particular neurological dysfunction (it just does, from the psychological / paraphilic stand point) but not automatically, I mean I guess seeing as it's more or less imaginary, some of the toddlercon people may just fantasize about toddlers who do have a sexual interest and that any actual molestation fantasy is safe as long as it is kept to the realm of imagination. Meh, I wouldn't say that it's a simple matter of preferences, because studies indicate otherwise but it's fine if it is or isn't for whatever individual. Or whatever, to each his own in this regards I suppose
__________________ Oh. . .my. . .fucking. . .god, I swear that if I see one more god damn censor blur devaluing an utterly magnificent piece of art; I'm going to kill every single thing that I see from that point on j/k. . . . .
It's like taking a fuckin knife to the fuckin Mona fucking Lisa and saying "Deruh, well, it look more classythis way to me!" what the fuck cunt came up with the idea of using censor blurs in situations where one should least expect them?
It's all about getting rid of all limitations in one's desire. As a creature of excess the girls will will never be young enough, the romance never romantic enough, and the fantasy never fantastic enough. It's not about studies and psychology Zombicide, it's about pushing the edge.
Ok I have something to say here, Toddlers are cute yes, but why in anyone in there right mind even THINK about doing it to a kid, for one, toddlercon is just a fantasy if you even think those your sick, two, and SIN, for one I don't believe in a GOD, so don't even try bringing moral into this, and three, everyone has there preferences and I for one like toddlercon, seeing there cute little bodys, but NO I would never do anything, and have never thought about doing anything 15 is the youngest for me even though I'm 20, and even then I still get sick even thinking about that I would do that stuff, I don't know why I like it, I just do.
I am really confused here. I don't understand this post at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takkun
Ok I have something to say here, Toddlers are cute yes, but why in anyone in there right mind even THINK about doing it to a kid,
It is called pedophilia and some of the people go as far as small children. It is very hard to define what the right mind is. Is it majority or the law of a country or a personal definition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takkun
for one, toddlercon is just a fantasy if you even think those your sick,
The rules of this site require of us to respect each other and our fetishes. Calling someone "sick" for thinking about something seems strange. Especially when it comes from an administrator of the lolicon site.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takkun
two, and SIN, for one I don't believe in a GOD, so don't even try bringing moral into this, and three, everyone has there preferences and I for one like toddlercon, seeing there cute little bodys, but NO I would never do anything, and have never thought about doing anything 15 is the youngest for me even though I'm 20, and even then I still get sick even thinking about that I would do that stuff, I don't know why I like it, I just do.
Just because it is not your fetish to fantasize about real little toddlers and your morals are not allowing you to think about it, it doesn't mean that others have no rights to have this kind of fetish or thoughts.
It isn't my fetish either but I wouldn't criticize preferences' of others.
Doing something to a toddler would be a crime but having a fantasy, fetish, imagination or even a desire is understandable to me. How else all line of toddler manga would be as popular as it is.
No offense, if I misunderstood something I apologize in advance.
A MIND IS A TERABLE THING, and they are all different, What get a rise out of one will not another, as long as this plays out only in the theater of the mind, no harm. Lolicon, shotacon, todlercon, all will get you some jail time if you act on them, so one is just a bad as the other, and I love them all. So check out what you like and stay away from that witch you don’t and don’t judge me for that which I enjoy.
__________________
SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES,
NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING
BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE
WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.:)
I can't relate to it either, Lolicon Girl. Besides their drastically underdeveloped, androgynous form / pudgy the fact of the matter is, toddlers don't fuck back nor do they physiologically express that they would or be able to handle it safely. Older kids significantly more frequently have sexual libidos, while toddlers almost if not always possess none, which, implies that toddlercon has a de facto rapist appeal and a particular neurological dysfunction (it just does, from the psychological / paraphilic stand point) but not automatically, I mean I guess seeing as it's more or less imaginary, some of the toddlercon people may just fantasize about toddlers who do have a sexual interest and that any actual molestation fantasy is safe as long as it is kept to the realm of imagination. Meh, I wouldn't say that it's a simple matter of preferences, because studies indicate otherwise but it's fine if it is or isn't for whatever individual. Or whatever, to each his own in this regards I suppose
I have read EVERY psycology book in print available in Oklahoma
So I can tell you this:
NO SUCH STUDY HAS EVER BEEN DONE!
The authors are giving their OPINIONS.
The only way such a study COULD be done
would be to track EVERYBODY who posts on all sites
containing the genre being investigated
and watch them 24/7 (without their knowledge OR consent) until they die.
Then compare notes and see what percentage of those people actually DO the acts depicted.
Ehehehehe loligirl is my wife, all for me:D.
Linear Mode
